![]() ![]() So I'm in agreement with you, it sounds like just a bug with userbenchmark. My temperatures at 3.9 averaged around 64c. And anything below 80c is perfectly fine for an overclock. You can do a Google Image Search for "Aida64 throttling" to see what it'll look like. Your temperatures seem great though and I don't see any throttling. I've even heard of some who verify for 24 hours, which is a bit much in my opinion. I've had tests fail at 30 minutes, some at 2 hours, some at 4 hours. It all depends on how SURE you want to be about it being stable. When I verify my overclock stability, I let that same Aida64 test run overnight (6+ hours). After seeing this, I'd be interested in seeing if you can do that same test for more than 1 hour. So this is with 1.38v set in the bios? You're dropping to as low as 1.281, so we both have similar vdroop. That will correspond to Package Temperature in HWMonitor. If you click Preferences in Aida64, you will probably have the option to enable "CPU Diode" sensor. Yeah, I ignore the temperature spikes as well. I have a feeling the throttling message is just a bug in Userbenchmark at this point. The 69c max in HWMonitor was a random spike, temps stabilized at 61c. ![]() I normally use Intel Burn Test to test stability of my overclocks, so this was new to me. I followed your advice and ran a 10 minute test with Aida64. During load, that 1.4125 becomes 1.325 (-0.0875), which is nearing my own recommended safe core voltage for 24/7 use (1.425v). Anything less and Aida64 will report a failure after about 30mins in some tests to an hour or two in others. At 3.9GHz, I'm forced to raise my core voltage in the bios to 1.4125v to be completely stable. I'd be interested in seeing a screenshot of your HWMonitor's line showing CPU VDD (accurate reading of vcore) during a stress test. I can't see it happening at such low temperatures, however. Just run a 10 minute test stressing CPU/FPU/Cache with HWMonitor open keeping an eye on Package Temperature. I believe Aida64's System Stability Test displays any throttling that may occur. Then, run the benchmark again with your OC and voltage again, and record the temperatures. Voltage will tend to increase power consumption (and generally, heat) exponentially, whereas frequency changes increase temperatures linearly.Ĭombining a higher overclock with higher voltage compounds the effect if you were already close to the capacity of your cooler, you could easily be running much higher temperatures now, causing throttling.īasically, revert your oc, run the benchmark and record your temperatures. I've never had this come up on the results page before, any ideas why it could be showing now?Ī small bump in voltage can have a large effect on temperature. I've tested both AMD's and the high performance power plans, but the notification is still there. Recently, when I complete a Userbenchmark run there's a notification that my CPU is being throttled. The only thing that's changed is a slightly higher overclock from 3.82GHz to 3.95GHz with a small bump in voltage from 1.35v to 1.38v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |